Today

Clear reporting on the stories that matter.

By Olivia Brooks | Explainers Desk
Section: News Climate & Extreme Weather
Article Type: News Report
7 min read

How Black mushroom hunters are reshaping who belongs in US forests

A growing group of Black foragers is finding food, community and a new relationship to land through mushrooms—while challenging who is seen as an expert.

Cover image for: How Black mushroom hunters are reshaping who belongs in US forests

On a wooded trail in Newton, Massachusetts, writer Maria Pinto stopped short. As described in a recent report in the Guardian, she saw what looked like a glowing yellow figure with a metallic sheen rising from the pine needles. It was a mushroom she had never seen before.

For Pinto and other Black mushroom hunters profiled in that reporting, encounters like this are not just about a novel ingredient for dinner. They are part of a broader effort to claim space in US forests, reconnect with land-based knowledge and shift who is recognized as an authority in mycology, the study of fungi.

While the available reporting is limited, it points to a small but visible movement: Black foragers and mushroom enthusiasts using fungi as a way to build community, challenge stereotypes about who belongs outdoors and deepen ties to the African diaspora.

A quiet shift in who is seen in the woods

The Guardian’s account centers on Black mushroom hunters in the United States who are actively seeking out wild fungi for food, medicine and study. Their experiences highlight a contrast between who has long been visible in US outdoor culture and who is increasingly present now.

Historically, most popular images of mushroom foraging in the US have featured white hobbyists or European immigrant communities. The Guardian article does not present hard demographic data, but it documents Black enthusiasts who are organizing group walks, sharing identification skills and posting their finds online.

Pinto’s experience in Newton is one example of how this looks on the ground: a solitary walk becomes an encounter with an unfamiliar species, which then connects to a wider network of people trading photos, field guides and recipes. The reporting describes participants who frame their practice as both practical—finding food—and symbolic, a way to be visibly at home in spaces where Black presence has often been treated as unusual or suspect.

Why mushrooms, and why now?

The Guardian’s reporting suggests several overlapping reasons Black mushroom hunters are turning to fungi in particular.

First, mushrooms are accessible. They appear in city parks, suburban greenbelts and small patches of woods like those in Newton as well as in remote forests. For people who may not have easy access to large tracts of public land, fungi offer a way to practice foraging close to home.

Second, mushrooms invite study. Mycology requires careful observation—checking gills, stems, colors, and the trees nearby. The article describes enthusiasts who lean into this as a form of everyday science, using field guides and community knowledge to build expertise over time.

Third, mushrooms are versatile. Many species are edible; others have medicinal uses; some play crucial roles in forest health by breaking down dead material. The Guardian piece frames this as part of their appeal: fungi are both tangible—something you can cook—and conceptually rich, a gateway into ecology.

Taken together, these traits make mushrooms a natural focal point for people looking to combine nourishment, learning and time outdoors.

Reclaiming land-based knowledge and diaspora ties

A central theme in the Guardian’s reporting is that Black mushroom hunters see their work as reconnecting with land-based traditions, including those linked to the African diaspora.

Participants describe mycology as a way to counter a common assumption that Black Americans are disconnected from nature or lack deep histories of foraging and farming. While the article does not provide a detailed historical account, it notes that enthusiasts explicitly invoke ancestral practices when they talk about why fungi matter to them.

In that framing, a mushroom walk is not only a leisure activity. It is also a small act of repair: learning to read the forest floor, to identify species and to understand seasonal cycles becomes a way to recover knowledge that has been interrupted or obscured by slavery, segregation and urban displacement.

The Guardian’s account emphasizes that this is as much emotional as it is practical. Finding an unfamiliar mushroom can feel, in Pinto’s words, unreal at first—almost like a visitation. Naming it, learning its role in the ecosystem and deciding whether to harvest it becomes a process of grounding that sense of wonder in skill and tradition.

Challenging risk narratives and safety fears

The reporting also touches on a quieter, but important, barrier: fear. Mushrooms carry two overlapping risk narratives for Black foragers.

One is biological. Some wild mushrooms are poisonous, and the Guardian article notes that new hunters are cautious about misidentification. This is a concern shared by all foragers, but it shapes how quickly people feel comfortable harvesting and eating what they find.

The other is social. The piece points to worries about being seen as suspicious or out of place in predominantly white outdoor spaces. For Black mushroom hunters, walking slowly through a park, crouching to examine the ground, or carrying a basket of fungi can draw attention. The reporting suggests that some participants are mindful of how they might be perceived by neighbors or law enforcement.

These twin risks—getting sick from a misidentified species, or being challenged for simply existing in the woods—help explain why organized groups and online communities feel so important in the story the Guardian tells. They offer safety in numbers, shared knowledge and a sense that others are doing the same thing.

Community, expertise and who counts as a mycologist

Another thread in the Guardian’s coverage is the question of expertise: who gets to be called a mycologist, and whose knowledge is treated as legitimate.

The article profiles Black mushroom hunters who are largely self-taught, building skills through field guides, workshops and peer networks rather than formal academic training. Their work blurs the line between hobbyist and scientist. They collect specimens, track seasonal patterns and sometimes contribute to broader efforts to document local fungi.

By taking mycology seriously, they challenge a hierarchy in which university researchers and established institutions are seen as the only authorities. The reporting suggests that for these hunters, insisting on their own expertise is part of a broader claim to belonging: they are not just visitors to the woods, but informed participants in the ecosystems they traverse.

This does not mean they reject formal science. Instead, the Guardian account portrays them as adding to it from the ground up, using lived experience and community practice to widen the circle of who is recognized as knowledgeable.

What this emerging movement could change

Because current reporting is limited, it is too early to say how large or lasting this shift will be. Still, the Guardian’s story points to several potential implications.

For outdoor culture in the US, visible Black mushroom hunters complicate a narrow image of who hikes, forages and studies nature. If their numbers grow, they could influence how parks and community groups design programs, who they feature in outreach materials and whose safety concerns they prioritize.

For mycology, a more diverse group of enthusiasts could expand the pool of people documenting local fungi. Even without formal research projects, more eyes on the forest floor can mean more observations, more photographs and more informal records of what is growing where.

For participants themselves, the impact appears more immediate. The Guardian article describes mushroom hunting as a source of nourishment, connection and joy. In that sense, the most significant change may be personal rather than institutional: a growing number of Black Americans finding ways to feel at home in the woods, one unexpected flash of yellow among the pine needles at a time.

What to watch next

Given the thin public evidence so far, several questions remain open:

  • Will more reporting document similar communities beyond the examples highlighted in the Guardian piece?
  • How will institutions—such as local parks, nature centers and mycological societies—respond to and support Black-led mushroom groups?
  • As these hunters gain visibility, will their safety concerns in outdoor spaces be taken more seriously?

For now, the Guardian’s account offers a snapshot: Black mushroom hunters using fungi to weave together food, science, ancestry and belonging. As more stories emerge, they will help clarify whether this is a niche subculture or the early edge of a broader reimagining of who is seen, and who feels safe, in America’s forests.

Continue Reading

Explore more articles on this topic and related subjects

Stay Informed

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Join our community of readers who stay ahead of the curve.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. See our Privacy Policy.